Showing posts with label book group. Show all posts
Showing posts with label book group. Show all posts

Monday, 5 August 2013

LLBG - July

Sorry for the delay in posting this up.  These past few weeks have been so busy!  Anyway, Lowestoft Library Book Group met on Tuesday 30th July, and discussed A Fine Balance by Rohinton Mistry.

I'm afraid to say that I didn't read it.  I read about 50 pages, so I can't comment on the story at all.  I do enjoy reading, but the book has over 600 pages, and the writing is really really tiny!  I know that shouldn't stop me reading a book, but somehow it does.  

From what I can gather, it's a book about a few people whose lives cross.  This does sound like my kind of book, as I like things that make connections.  Maybe one day I'll pick it up and give it another go.

It's set in India in the 70s and 80s, and apparently outlines some of the terrible things that took place there during this time.

I'm sorry for the uselessness of this post, and shame on me for not reading the book!

In August we will be having a meeting, but there is no book.  This is because it's the day after the Bank Holiday, and people are usually away.  So if anyone fancies coming along, they're more than welcome, and we will be discussing books that we've been reading over the summer.  It's on Tuesday 27th August, 7-9pm, in the Navigator Room at Lowestoft Library.

Wednesday, 26 June 2013

LLBG - June

Yesterday, Lowestoft Library Book Group met to discuss The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society by Mary Ann Shaffer and Annie Barrows.

I read this book a few years ago, so was pleased to read it again.  It's a story about an author living in London during and after World War II.  She finds out about a literary society in Guernsey, and writes letters to the members in order to find out about their group and their life on the island during the Nazi occupation.  The book is the collection of her correspondence.

Initially, it can get a bit confusing as you're not always sure who is the voice of each letter (there's no real distinction between the characters), but once you immerse yourself in the story, it doesn't really matter who's 'speaking'.  The ending does seem a bit rushed and a bit twee, and there are a couple of elements throughout the book which seem unnecessary in the greater scheme of things.  But these things can be forgiven.

Most people enjoyed the book, even though there were a few niggly bits.  But those who enjoyed it hadn't wanted the book to end, and were contemplating what the sequel could be about.

Our next meeting is on Tuesday 30th July and we will be discussing A Fine Balance by Rohinton Mistry.

Friday, 31 May 2013

LLBG - May

Sorry for the delay in posting this, but I've had a busy week at work, and have only just found some time to get my blogging done.  Anyway, on Tuesday evening, Lowestoft Library Book Group met for it's May session, where we discussed Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen.

There there's this unwritten list of 'classics' floating around, and we all know we should have read those books but never have.  Pride and Prejudice is one of those books.  I've never read it before.  I haven't even seen the film(s).  I know I should have at least watched the one with Colin Firth/Mr. Darcy in the pond/lake/whatever-it-is, but it never really appealed to me.

So I started to read the book, and I tried, I really tried to get through the chapters, but I just couldn't.  I know it's a classic, but it really is dull.  And yes, I know it is 'of the time' and it reflects a certain society and all that goes along with that.  But it's still dull.

What shall we do today?  I know, let's do some sewing, then some swooning, then get ready for a ball so we can meet handsome men.  And what do you fancy doing tomorrow?  Tomorrow is quite a busy day for me.  First I'm sewing, then I'm swooning, then I have to get ready for a ball so I can meet some handsome men.

Please forgive me if more happens in this story, but I only got to page 144 before I had to give up.  The words were going into my eyes but they weren't making their way to my brain.

I'm not too sure if other people enjoyed the book or not because I'd been at work from 10:30 until 7pm, and then Book Group was from 7pm until 9pm, so I was a bit tired.  It's a good job that I work in the library and didn't have to panic about being late!

Our next meeting is on Tuesday 25th June, 7-9 pm, and we will be discussing The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society by Marry Ann Shaffer.  I read this book a few years ago and enjoyed it, so I'm looking forward to reading it again.

Wednesday, 27 March 2013

LLBG March

Last night was the March meeting of Lowestoft Library Book Group.  This month we have been reading Ancestral Vices by Tom Sharpe.  When I started it, I really couldn't get into it.  I had absolutely no idea what it was about or what was supposed to be happening.  My eyes took in the words on the page but they didn't make their way up into my brain box.  Some books get me like that.  However, I did get excited when I reached page 43.  Two characters are sitting down to dinner and are served turtle soup.  One character says, "The shell came from the Aquarium at Lowestoft and the contents from Fortnum & Mason."

However, continuing reading I still had absolutely no idea what was going on.  The book cover doesn't have a blurb, so I had a little bit of a snout around the internet and found out that, apparently, this book is really funny.  I thought it must get funnier the further I get into it, but one of the funniest bits in the book (according to t'internet people) was something I'd already read.

I like to think that I've got a pretty decent sense of humour, but this book was more irritating than funny.  And not irritating to the point that it turns into funny.  Just irritating.

I've been a member of this book group since 2009 (ish) and for a couple of years I would read part of each book (around 100 pages) but never finish them.  Then, at the start of last year, I made a bit of a resolution to read the books, even if I really didn't like them.  And I did it.  I pushed my way through hundreds of pages of dreadful words, but I read them.  Until now.  I tried.  I really did.  But I couldn't do it.  I couldn't bring myself to finish this book.  That shows just how bad it is.  I managed to get to chapter 12/page 154, but I'm not really sure what happened in those 154 pages, and I really don't care what happens after.

*****

Our next meeting will be Tuesday 30th April, and we will be discussing The Crimson Rooms by Katharine McMahon.

Wednesday, 27 February 2013

LLBG February

This last month we were asked to read The Time Traveler's Wife by Audrey Niffenegger.  I wasn't really looking forward to reading this as I'd seen the film a few years ago and didn't enjoy that.  However, as with most book/film adaptations, the book was much better than the film.  I'm not going to say that the book was brilliant, but it was more enjoyable than the film.  As hinted in the title, time travel plays a big part in the story, which can be a bit confusing as it jumps about all over the place, but you do get used to it.  The story is a bit limp (in my opinion - that's why I didn't really enjoy the film), but the book is beautifully written.  Audrey Niffenegger has a wonderful way with words, so the text is easy to read, and although the story does get boring, I still wanted to read it because of how it's written.

Apparently, the book group had already read this book a few years ago (before I joined), so a few of the members didn't read it this time around.  Those of us who did, didn't really like it.  The time travel element confused most people, as the story jumps all over the place.  There were also a couple of people who pointed out plot flaws with the time travel.  As I'm not a scientist, or a Dr. Who fan, I can't say I know too much about time travel.  However, apparently if the present you and the future you are in the same place at the same time, the universe implodes.  There are a few occasions in the book where present and future characters spend time together, and, as far as I'm aware, the universe didn't implode.

So, all in all, this book is very *meh*.  Read it if you want, but if you don't, you're not missing out on much!

Our next meeting will be on Tuesday 26th March, and we will be discussing Ancestral Vices by Tom Sharpe.

Wednesday, 30 January 2013

LLBG January

Lowestoft Library Book Group doesn't have a meeting in December, as the last Tuesday of the month is always in Christmas week (last year it was on Christmas Day), and people aren't too fond of abandoning their festive celebrations to sit in the library and talk about a book they no doubt didn't read!  Because of this, we had two books to read over December and January to be discussed at the January meeting.  These were The Crossing Places by Elly Griffiths, and The Interpretation of Murder by Jed Rubenfeld.


As you should all by now, I'm a very pedantic reader.  Since writing a book, I've read books with a different eye.  So as I was reading The Crossing Places, I used an envelope as a book mark, and made sure I had a pen or pencil nearby to note down the various bits that jumped out at me on the back of said envelope.  It's not to say that this was a bad book or that I didn't enjoy it.  I'd just like to know how these things slipped through the editor's net.


Page 25: "empty can of coke" - There are two things wrong with this snippit.  Firstly, Coke is a brand name, from Coca-Cola.  If it is Coke (from Coca-Cola) then it should have a capital 'C'.  If it's just cola (from Tesco or ASDA or any other own brand soft drink manufacturer) then it should have a small 'c'.  It does annoy me when people write 'biro', 'hoover', 'sellotape', etc.  Someone has put their name to their invention, and we should all show respect to them my capitalising these words.  Secondly, if it is indeed a 'can of coke' (sic), how can it be empty?  A 'can of coke' (sic) indicates that there is indeed something in the can, like a packet of crisps, or a box of chocolates, or a jar of marmalade (the list could go on; have a looksee next time you're in the supermarket).  If the can was indeed empty, then it should be described as an 'empty Coke can'.

Page 64: "googles" - Google, like Coke, is a brand name, and should have a capital 'G'.

Page 68: "March 1998 ... Look at the cursuses and the causeways."
Page 70: "She was halfway through the letter dated March 1996, with its surprising mention of cursuses and causeways."
Make your mind up, was it 1998 or 1996??

Page 146 & 147: "diet coke" - Brand name!! Diet Coke (both letters capitalised)!!

Page 148: "coke" - Ok, I'm getting bored of this now!

But one bit that did make me laugh appeared on page 154/155: "The wife belongs to a book club ... They never talk about the bloody books at all."  I don't know why, but this sentiment sounds familiar ...

The general view from the reading group that this was a good book, easy to read, and it flowed well.  But the sex scene (and the result of this sex scene) was completely unnecessary and almost detracted from the book.

***

I, thankfully, have no grammar issues with The Interpretation of Murder.  However, I do have other issues with this book.  It has two main voices; Younger, written in the first person, and the narrator, written in the third person.  Younger tells his own story from his own point of view, and the narrator tells the story of all the other characters.  To start with I quite liked this device, but after a while it became confusing, as more and more characters were introduced.  I got bored of that fairly quickly.

As the title suggests, this book is about murder, and I know with all murder mysteries we (the audience/reader) are supposed to suspect the wrong person up until the denouement where *surprise surprise* is wasn't who we thought all along!  But with this story, it was extremely contrived and unbelievable.  I felt let down when I found out 'whodunnit'.  It's a very long book, slightly tedious at times, with twists and turns and cliffhangers (I will commend Rubenfeld on his cliffhangers; they did grip me, and they did prevent me from putting the book down), and I expected a great reveal, but it was more like a deflated balloon flapping around in winter tree branches.  All I can do is shrug my shoulders at this book.

The majority of the group didn't like this book.  They felt that the author was showing off with his knowledge of Freud and Shakespeare, plus a million other things that he knows everything about.  It also had too many characters and too many things going on for it to be an easy read.  I know not everything should be an easy read, but if it's not easy it should at least be enjoyable!

*****

Our next meeting is on Tuesday 26th February, and we will be discussing The Time Traveler's Wife by Audrey Niffenegger. 

Wednesday, 28 November 2012

LLBG November

Last night, Lowestoft Library Book Group met for their November meeting.  This past month we read The Wandering Falcon by Jamil Ahmad.  As you know, I don't do book reviews.  Even if I wanted to do book reviews, I couldn't for this one.  I found myself just reading the words and not taking in any of the story.  Nothing really stood out to capture my imagination and keep me gripped to the plot.  That's a bit of a lie.  The first chapter was good, and so were the last two chapters.  But everything in between seemed to pass me by.

The only bit that really interested me was towards the end, when a couple were getting married, and the groom came into possession of a bear.  The wedding party walk from town to town, and the bear dances and walks with them.  When the husband and wife get into their house, the bear comes too.  The husband seems to love the bear more than his wife, so she takes her revenge.  The husband trains the bear by hitting it with a stick.  The wife puts nails into the stick, which causes the bear to get injured whenever the husband hit it.  Because he loves the bear so much, he threatens his wife and tells her that whatever happens to the bear will happen to her also.  So she will eat whatever the bear eats, but if the bear isn't hungry, she will go without food.  She eventually runs away and gets sold as a prostitute. 

The book group discussion focussed on the social and cultural differences between England and Pakistan, where the book is set, such as the way they treat women and children, and how killing and disemboweling is a normal way of life.  I vaguely remember the negative treatment of women in the book, and obviously the word 'disembowel' is going to jump from the page.  But I was unimpressed with the whole thing, so I can't really say much more. 

The meeting last night was fairly hurried, as we had to leave by eight, giving us only an hour to talk.

Next month there won't be a meeting, as it would fall on Christmas Day and I don't think anyone would fancy that.  So we have two books to read before our meeting in January; The Crossing Places by Elly Griffiths, and The Interpretation of Murder by Jed Rubenfeld.  Some cheery stuff to read over Christmas!

Wednesday, 31 October 2012

LLBG October

This month we have been reading The Picture of Dorian Grey by Oscar Wilde.  Although this is a book that everyone 'should' have read, it was one of the many books on my 'to read' list, and I've finally read it.  Before I delve into the opinions of myself and the book group, I just want to point out some notable quotations that stood out for me.  I know there are hundreds of books already in print which contain lists of Wilde's famous words, but they are the quotations that other people deem important.  The following lines are the ones that I deem important.






*****
The Preface 
The artist is the creator of beautiful things.
To reveal art and conceal the artist is art's aim.
The critic is he who can translate into another manner or a new material his impression of beautiful things.
The highest, as the lowest, form of criticism is a mode of autobiography.
Those who find ugly meanings in beautiful things are corrupt without being charming.  This is a fault.
Those who find beautiful meanings in beautiful things are cultivated.  For these there is hope.
They are the elect to whom beautiful things mean only beauty.
There is no such thing as a moral or an immoral book.  Books are well written, or badly written.  That is all.
The nineteenth century dislike of Realism is the rage of Caliban seeing his own face in a glass.
The nineteenth century dislike of Romanticism is the rage of Caliban not seeing his own face in a glass.  The moral life of man forms part of the subject-matter of the artist, but the morality of art consists in the perfect use of an imperfect medium.  No artist desires to prove anything.  Even things that are true can be proved.
No artist has ethical sympathies.  An ethical sympathy in an artist is an unpardonable mannerism of style.
No artist is ever morbid.  The artist can express everything.
Thought and language are to the artist instruments of an art.
Vice and virtue are to the artist materials for an art.
From the point of view of form, the type of all the arts is the art of the musician.  From the point of view of feeling, the actor's craft is the type.
All art is at once surface and symbol.
Those who go beneath the surface do so at their peril.
Those who read the symbol do so at their peril.
It is the spectator, and not life, that art really mirrors.
Diversity of opinion about a work of art shows that the work is new, complex, and vital.
When critics disagree, the artist is in accord with himself.
We can forgive a man for making a useful thing as long as he does not admire it.  The only excuse for making a useless thing is that one admires it intensely.
All art is quite useless.
…for there is only one thing in the world worse than being talked about, and that is not being talked about.
You know more than you think you know, just as you know less than you want to know. 
He played with the idea, and grew wilful; tossed it into the air and transformed it; let it escape and recaptured it; made it iridescent with fancy, and winged it with paradox.
I’m too fond of reading books to care to write them, Mr. Erskine.  I should like to write a novel certainly; a novel that would be as lovely as a Persian carpet, and as unreal.  But there is no literary public in England for anything except newspapers, primers, and encyclopædias.  Of all people in the world the English have the least sense of the beauty of literature. 
She was a curious woman, whose dresses always looked as if they had been designed in a rage and put on in a tempest.
The only artists I have ever known who are personally delightful are bad artists.  Good artists exist simply in what they make, and consequently are perfectly uninteresting in what they are.  A great poet, a really great poet, is the most unpoetical of all creatures.  But inferior poets are absolutely fascinating.  The worse their rhymes are, the more picturesque they look.  The mere fact of having published a book of second-rate sonnets makes a man quite irresistible.  He lives the poetry that he cannot write.  The others write the poetry that they dare not realise.
But then the only things that one can use in fiction are the things that one has ceased to use in fact.
I love acting.  It is so much more real than life.
Love is a more wonderful thing than Art.
They are both simply forms of imitation. 
There are only two kinds of people who are really fascinating - people who know absolutely everything, and people who know absolutely nothing.
And, certainly, to him, Life itself was the first, the greatest of the arts, and for it all the other arts seemed to be but a preparation.
One's days were too brief to take the burden of another's errors on one's shoulders.  Each man lived his own life and paid his own price for living it.  The only pity was one had to pay so often for a single fault.  One had to pay over and over again, indeed.  In her dealings with man, Destiny closed her accounts.
*****

Most people enjoyed the book, but found it very wordy.  Wilde does have a fantastic way with language, and his vocabulary is superb, but sometimes he does go on and on and on and on with his description and it can get quite boring.  I almost feel a bit bad about saying negative things about Oscar Wilde, because he is one of the greats, but this book didn't meet my expectations.  I've read two of his plays; Salomé and The Importance of Being Earnest, which were strange and funny, and I had hoped for the same from this book.

One member of the group made an interesting comment.  She said that a lot of the original story had been omitted from the published version as it was too risqué for the time.  Apparently, Wilde had written about homosexuality and opium dens in much more detail, and more frequently, than was actually published, as well as other example of debauchery.  This makes sense, as the story did feel disjointed in parts, and there were hints towards the terrible things that Dorian had done during his life, but no actual details. 

This book was Wilde's only novel, and many people at the group said that it probably would have scanned better had it been a play.  I don't know if I agree or disagree with this, but I do feel that it was lacking a lot of the story.  Although this is a well known story, I won't give away the ending.  All I will say is that the ending was a surprise, but it was too sudden considering the wordiness of the book.

I'm not going to tell you that you shouldn't read this book.  However, I will tell you not to expect too much from it.  And don't let it put you off reading Wilde's plays.  They're brilliant.

Next month we will be discussing The Wandering Falcon by Jamil Ahmad.

Wednesday, 26 September 2012

LLBG September

Last night I went to Lowestoft Library's monthly book group meeting; the September edition.  We were there to discuss Afterwards by Rosamund Lipton.  As usual, we tend to discuss everything other than the book, until someone asks the fateful question: "So what did everyone think of the book?"  And as usual there was a short silence as people try to think of a diplomatic way to say that they didn't like the book.

The general consensus of the group was that Afterwards was not very good.  Most people had read it all and a few people read some of it (but gave up because they were too frustrated with the story and/or characters) and, of course, there were those who didn't even bother to read it at all.  I'm usually in the latter group, but I did get around to reading it all this time.  Not because I particularly liked the story, and definitely not because I liked the characters, because I didn't like a single one of them.  I read it in order to find out 'whodunnit'.  I won't give away too much, but the main premise of the story is a school is set on fire, a teenage girl is in the building when it's on fire, the girl's mother goes in to rescue her, both the girl and the mother end up in hospital where they both have out of body experiences.  The mother becomes the narrator and converses with her daughter throughout the whole novel.  They try to work out who started the fire, and like any good mystery story, there were red herrings.  We, as the reader, were taken from pillar to post, trying to work out 'whodunnit' and every time I guessed, I was wrong.  And I was genuinely surprised by the person 'whodunnit'.  So in that respect, it was good.  But in all other respects, it wasn't.

It dragged.  It was tedious and annoying and frustrating.  If out of body experiences could actually happen, how likely could two people do it at the same time?  And how likely would they be able to engage in conversation as if they were both in their bodies?

The characters were also annoying.  The mother, who narrated the story, was irritating.  She named her son Adam, but kept calling him Addie.  I have no idea why you would give someone a name, and then 'shorten' it to something longer than the original name.  And there was also a Penny and a Jenny, which was unnecessary.

I did, however, find a lovely little line in the book which sat well with me.  Grace, the mother, is talking about Adam, her son, and says, "He was prepared for unhappy endings, but not unjust ones."  I know most people would have skipped over that line, but that's how I feel a lot of the time.  But that's by the by.

The highlight of the evening was the delicious lemon and rosemary cake that one of the members brought it, as a celebration for being made redundant and not having to go to work anymore.

The lowlight of the evening came at the end of the group meeting when everyone left to go home.  Across the road from the library is a public carpark.  It's free to park there after 6pm, so it's a pretty convenient place to park for the book group, which starts at 7pm.  As I pulled into the carpark last night I noticed that there was a fence around the perimeter and a sign by the entrance which stated that the carpark would be closed from the 26th to the 28th of September.  As yesterday was the 25th, and as there were already some cars parked in the carpark, I parked there as usual.  Other members of the group parked there, as usual, and we didn't worry about anything as the carpark wasn't going to be closed until the 26th.

At 9pm, when we had finished briefly discussing the book and seriously putting the world to rights, we all left to go to the carpark and go home.  As we approached the carpark (which contained at least 10 cars) we noticed that the fence had been pulled across the entrance and locked with a chain and padlock.  

Thankfully, the caretaker was still in the library and he opened the doors so we could go back inside to keep warm.  Someone called someone from the council who eventually came and unlocked the carpark.  I've never seen a group of people rush to their cars and drive out of the carpark so quickly.  No-one wanted to be locked in.

Why would anyone lock cars inside a carpark, especially when the sign said that it would be closed on the 26th?

Our next book is The Picture of Dorian Gray by Oscar Wilde.  I'm very pleased about this, as this is one of the many books on my 'to read' list.  I just hope I enjoy it.  Well, it can't be much worse than this month's attempt at literature!